5 replaced http://meta.skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link
4 replaced http://meta.skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link

My question was inspired by thisthis question here. Essentially for questions with an impossible negation it was advised that the best approach is to say we don't know or simply give a summary of current knowledge on the subject.

My question was inspired by this question here. Essentially for questions with an impossible negation it was advised that the best approach is to say we don't know or simply give a summary of current knowledge on the subject.

My question was inspired by this question here. Essentially for questions with an impossible negation it was advised that the best approach is to say we don't know or simply give a summary of current knowledge on the subject.

3 added 197 characters in body
source | link
  1. With the worlds most powerful countries continually being manipulated, with the amount of people privy to this knowledge someone would have come forward.

  2. There is poor evidence of collusion on such a grand scale. The worlds most powerful countries often disagree on key matters

  3. 3.
  4. If ultimate control is the key, why not do it in a more direct way? Depending on how long a shadow government may have been in control, would it not have the resources to take more direct control?

  1. With the worlds most powerful countries continually being manipulated, with the amount of people privy to this knowledge someone would have come forward.

  2. There is poor evidence of collusion on such a grand scale. The worlds most powerful countries often disagree on key matters

  3. 3.
  1. With the worlds most powerful countries continually being manipulated, with the amount of people privy to this knowledge someone would have come forward.

  2. There is poor evidence of collusion on such a grand scale. The worlds most powerful countries often disagree on key matters

  3. If ultimate control is the key, why not do it in a more direct way? Depending on how long a shadow government may have been in control, would it not have the resources to take more direct control?

2 added 3505 characters in body
source | link
    Post Undeleted by Sonny Ordell
    Post Deleted by Sonny Ordell
1
source | link