Timeline for Why was an answer about fracking deleted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 9:36 | comment | added | DevSolar | ..."avoiding the question" and being "a political rant" (as if the claimant's statement weren't, just more carefully worded). -- I feel that moderation is needed when there is an actual problem, not when a statement goes against the grain of a moderator's world view. That's what the voting system is for, which doesn't deny even the OP to as much as read what a user took some effort to formulate. | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 9:35 | comment | added | DevSolar | The argument that's been made is that mods want to hold this site to a set of high standards. I understand that, and sympathize. However, sometimes I get the feeling that the mods themselves have a rather specific view on what is "correct", and come down pretty hard on anything that doesn't quite fit the mold. Peter's answer, for example, aims at the fact that fracking does drive down oil prices (as it reduces demand), but does not drive down fossil fuel consumption. It uses strong wording, but I feel the assumption is fair (and sourced). It was closed as... (ctd.) | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 9:31 | history | answered | krubo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |