11

The following passage from the Skeptics FAQ has always bothered me:

However, if your motivation is “I would like others to explain __ to me”, then you are probably OK.

While that's perfectly acceptable for other Stack Exchange sites, I don't think it is here. Simply put, we verify rather than explain. I don't think a single “I would like others to explain __ to me” type of question would ever fall as on-topic. Therefore, that section of the FAQ is misleading.

Can something be done about this?

3

How about the simple change of "explain __ to me" to "explain what the evidence says about __ to me" which changes the focus from the claim to understanding the evidence about the claim.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .