Should we have one?
If so, what should be in it?
One thing that would be an excellent thing to blog would be some of our killer answers. I'm thinking a kind of Mythbusters style approach:
Is it true that hot water freezes faster than cold water and if so, what practical applications have there been found for this phenomenon?
...In certain circumstances. This is the Mpemba effect
We have a load of well researched informative answers on the site that are almost ready-to-publish blog posts in themselves.
This is something I'd subscribe to!
A blog might be interesting but maintaining it requires a nontrivial amount of work and the benefit is questionable:
There are already some very prominent skeptics blogs out there with which we basically have no chance of competing. Unless we find a well-defined niche which our blog would fill, it does not offer enough value to our site to make it worthwhile.
Additionally, Stack Exchange is already using Google+ as a platform to broadcast interesting questions with some small editorialising. This could be improved and intensified.
(I’m not necessarily convinced that this is true, I just want to put it out here as an alternative to vote on.)