I thought this was going to die on its own, but it seems people have started answering it, so we'd better discuss it.
The assertion is that this is a 'skeptical' question because "it's a factual statement". However we are not a site dedicated to answering all 'factual' questions. We are focussed on science and pseudoscience, with some forays into history and a few other specifics. Allowing any factual question is going to broaden the site too far. The question is really about religion, or possibly literature. If we are going to aloow these questions because they are 'factual', why would we not allow 'factual' questions about the contents of the Harry Potter books? Or mathematics?
There is already a site devoted to answering questions exactly like this, and the questioner has given no reason for asking it here instead of that site, except for the slight inconvenience of having to ask his three questions in three different places (in practice one answer spoke for two of his books).