As you yourself supplied, it is okay in terms of how StackExchange is structured. However, there is a certain amount of integrity and intellectual honesty that must be applied when selecting the answer as the one which will be given the distinction of being the accepted answer at the site. Just because a question receives answers, and the answer receives subsequent votes, doesn't necessarily make it right, however there may be some indicators that the answer is better supported by facts. Should an answer not be in line with your own perception of the "correct" answer, you are being nothing more than an ideologue, and are close minded. Not the goal of this site.
I often learn new material when researching an answer, or even reading other people's answers. As Carl Sagan famously said:
In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken," and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion.
Keynote address at CSICOP conference (1987), as quoted in Do Science and the Bible Conflict? (2003) by Judson Poling, p. 30
If you are so convinced that your position is correct, and cannot fathom why people do not agree with you, I suggest that you examine your claim to intelligence and skepticism...