There was a question about StackOverflow productivity: Has Stack Overflow saved billions of dollars in programmer productivity? I answered it to the best of my ability. Rather than asking a question, or for claification the moderator closed it presumably because he didn't like the answer. That's an egregious use of an answer-close. Moderators should not being use their delete/censure button in replace of a down-vote. This answer isn't back pocket calculation. It uses all of the official data made mention and explains how that data should be adjusted and in which direction. I'm unsure at why the moderator things it's a "back pocket calculation" and I can't even ask him a question on it.
Please uncensure this post. You can't just delete it because the conclusion isn't of the same bias that you want, or because you want your question to ferment as you wait for more upvotes.
To make matters even worse, Sklivvz the mod is a paid employee of StackExchange. It's clear he is protecting his company and not acting in the best interests of an objective reduction of a broad grandiose valuation to something reasonable and obviously (imho) absurd.