Why are the moderators doing waht they want? E.g. the delete 4 paragraphs of my question, remove youtube link and after pointing at that wrong behavior they put the url back and write their own question.
If scientific method is removing all background information from the question, then you are not scientific at all.
What's the purpose of user asking question, if they change the question completely?
I have problem with this question and a moderator who acted on it:
I think he should stop censoring the questions like mine. Currently the question looks like this (it was written by the moderator from A to Z, btw):
I have seen this episode about religion from the documentary series "Through the Wormhole" and how it is disappearing and they say that it will have only 10% theists in New Zealand by 2050. Is this true?
You can view the documentary on YouTube and they discuss the subject at about the 23 minute mark.
And this is how it was before the changes (I know there are grammatical mistakes, I am not a native English speaker, however, if bad English is the reason for attacking a user then it's very unprofessional and childish):
I have seen this episode about religion from the documentary series "Through the wormhole" and how it is disappearing and they say that it will have only 10% theists in New Zealand by 2050.
How could they predict something like that?
Because it's like with classical music. You would say, well it's so old, no radio play classical music nowadays, but still, there are very many people who like classical music and I would say that there will be a lot of people who like classical music even in 2050.
Here is the document. they talk about this subject at about 23rd minute:
http://youtu.be/qrIq5xd8nBM?t=23m
How could they predict such thing? Is this for real?
Do they include the rise of nationalism and patriotism all over the world, what about the economic situation, do they know that in Europe and all over the world the number of jobless people are increasing? Do they know that these people are connected. what about new types of religions that are emerging like Scientology etc.?
It seems these "predictions" are:
A) very unprofessional and unscientific
or
B) with a hidden agenda
Through the wormhole is one big disapointment. Unlike Cosmos or The Universe series it has so much speculation and charlatans in every episode that's degrading science in general.
i am not against anybody. Wheather it is a theist or atheist or agnostic or whatsoever, however, these speculative notions in such popular documentaries are putting them in one bag with Beverly Hills 90210.
UPDATE: There was an edit suggesting to remove my subjective question if this could be an atheist propaganda. But I disagree because I think that many anti-religious movements are distorting facts to their liking. So, I will ask if you think that this is an Atheist propaganda or not.
He even removed the youtube link after the second revision, so it shows that the moderators need to have:
a) more responsibility
or
b) be more controlled by others (moderators, users etc.)
Right now the moderators are in my humble opinion misusing their power as could be seen from these links:
What is with the Zionist censorship of skeptics.se?
Too much censorship in this community?
Are moderator decisions too hard to challenge?
P.S. Moderators please add the tag "censorship" to the tags for the question (I am not 300 points and above right now). I think that even people who are not the ruling class on this forum could be able to use the right words. Thank you.