We have this question, currently on hold, but more or less OK since the edit.
The question says that Musk, on the video, talks about putting the entire united states on solar power.
The problem arises when one watches the video and notices that, in any moment of the video, Musk talked about going full solar, thus making the question incompatible with the linked claim.
Some people suggested to edit the question to make it correct. However, as far as I see, that would change the question too much, making it different from the apparent intent of the OP.
What should we do in cases like this, when the OP seems to misunderstand the claim reference? Should we consider the question valid, and answer something in the lines of "Your reference says something that differs from your question", or should we edit the question to make it match the claim?