The question of "what qualifies as evidence" is intrinsic to every single answer here.
Of course, you and I agree on the definition of evidence, but for many potential readers this is a point that does need to be made repeatedly.
It is far too easy to dismiss a bunch of like-minded individuals patting each other on the back: now that you have already formed a well founded opinion on the value of creationist "evidence" you can dismiss it out of hand with as much of a chuckle as moon hoaxers, pro-pathogen advocates, flat earthers, homeopaths, chiropractors, etc.
In so far as stackexchange is read much more than it is written, no, you don't need to see a treatise on evidence, but J. Random Googler just might.