I have recently noticed users introducing an "interestingness" or "consequential" test in addition to or in place of our notability requirement.
- That result doesn't sound very interesting
- The claim [...] is irrelevant to anything and overly trivial
- The main critique I have of this particular question is: So what? [...] I know the image is charges with horrible imagery, but not sure if this is believed with any consequence.
In the third example (the only one that has been placed on-hold), our standard notability test would have been sufficient to place the question on-hold.
Can we explicitly accept or reject this triviality/relevance/consequence/interestingness test?