If someone questions the notability of a claim, or the claimant, and someone else wishes to assert the notability of the claim/claimant, should they avoid adding a comment, and instead edit the question?

In the question Does Female Circumcision reduce urinary tract infections? , the OP provided information about the notability of the claimant in a comment (I think he indicated that the author of the quoted claim was notable, and had an English-language Wikipedia article about the author). However, the comment has since been deleted, and a user is currently questioning the notability of the claim. Should the OP have provided the information about the claimant in the question instead?

I understand that claims have to be notable, but I am concerned that providing too much information about the notability of a claim may be distracting.

Note: I'm not saying that the person who deleted the comment is the same person who is questioning the notability of the claim.

  • I have recently edited the question. I hope this clears up the misunderstanding about notability. I am hesitant to answer this question until it is clear it has, so we aren't discussing the same thing in two places. – Oddthinking May 9 '17 at 4:02

I think there was some honest mistake in there.

Our notability policy requires fixing the question if notability is disputed:

If one person shows up, searches for evidence that the claim is notable, and then disputes the [notability of the] claim (leaves a comment, or flags for moderator attention) - then it's the responsibility of the asker (or your friendly neighborhood editor) to dig up a real, verifiable source.

-FAQ: Must all questions be notable?

Clearly this was not done. Clarifications were left in comments. Comments were deleted. A question whose notability was in doubt was not originally fixed.

All is sorted now, though.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .