I would like us to collect best practices for editing questions.

Particularly, how should one know when a rephrased question is worth another attempt, and how should one proceed when making revisions? What editing techniques make it more likely that a question will be better received by the community?

  • I see no reason to make this question Community Wiki.
    – Borror0
    Apr 4, 2011 at 2:02
  • @Borror Your edits/shortening look ok to me. I was thinking new users could use some hints at editing questions. Perhaps another older meta has such a list already?
    – Paul
    Apr 4, 2011 at 2:09
  • If you think you can improve the question or answer without altering the meaning significantly, edit. See also: skeptics.stackexchange.com/privileges/edit
    – Borror0
    Apr 4, 2011 at 2:15

1 Answer 1


Although your question phrased as if it's about editing, it's really about asking questions. After all, by wanting what gets a question reopened, you're asking for what differentiates a good question from a bad one.

I covered this in detail in the past, but here's what's usually the key point:

  • Put energy in summarizing the position you're skeptical of. Quoting the exact claim is the surefire and laziest way to do it, but a solid summary is just as good. The idea is to give enough information to the readers so that they understand what you want them to fact-check.

If people have to guess what you mean, you have not done a good job writing (or rewriting) the question. The question must be very clear, to anyone reading it. Most of us can't read minds.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .