I'm probably going to get bashed here yet again, but I hope for this site to get a little bit more open rather than changing its name.
I'll give few examples of what I mean that I quickly gathered over just few hours on the site:
I don't think questions like this should be closed, even if they don't comply strictly with the scope of applying skepticism. To me, that's one good instance of a question that could just be turned into a CW and left as a list of answers as it was intended and as it would pass any other SEN site, such as ask different, had it been about "the cult of apple" or something. Cults is a skeptic subject.
And here's another question that could have been moved to meta, though it's perfectly fine to be closed as per the current site's motto it's also a very valid skeptic question to ask!
So, my hope, as usual, is for a broader site. But that's a tendency I have that goes against the (still) current flow of Stack Exchange Network of building strict audiences among family sites. While I think that SEN belief is changing, Skeptics is a clear instance in which I may be bluntly wrong and if that's so then I trust it should just be renamed to try preventing further confusion (from newcomers that is).