All Questions

Tagged with
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3
votes
2answers
130 views

How notable must doubt be?

Skeptics requires questions to be about notable claims. The burden of proof is on the question to provide evidence that the claim is notable. Must the question also provide evidence that there is a ...
11
votes
1answer
122 views

Does a notable claim remain notable if notable sources remove the claim?

Consider the situation: A notable source posts an article including an incredible claim. Someone links to the source as a notable claim, asking a question on Skeptics. At some point in the future, ...
1
vote
1answer
45 views

Would my question fit on this site?

I'd like to know: Why do people repeat certain typing mistakes? I'm from Lebanon, the "Lebanese" way of saying yes is "eh", people keep making the same mistake, typing "rh", never ever "wh", I ...
0
votes
0answers
34 views

Are notable claims of the past, claiming to predict a future event whose time has now passed, on-topic?

A notable Fringe Science researcher, using his purported m4d 1337 math, astronomy, and geography skillz, published a claim back in the 1990's predicting that there would be an astronomical alignment ...
0
votes
2answers
69 views

What should I do about a huge compiled list of claims?

So, I just read an article (on cracked.com) that has between 20 and 100 claims, depending on how granular one goes, most of which at first glance seem interesting enough to want to test them for ...
1
vote
1answer
38 views

Are questions about claims that can be empirically verified, but not at this time, on topic?

One of the basic requirements on this site is that questions must be empirically verifiable. If a claim is notable, and could in theory be subject to empirical verification, but the likelihood of ...
1
vote
1answer
44 views

Is migrating these kind of questions to other Stack Exchange sites a good idea?

In the question Did the murder of Ernst von Rath partly provoke the events of "Kristallnacht"? , it's being proposed to migrate the question to History.SE . This has happened already with at ...
3
votes
1answer
74 views

Are questions about becoming a better skeptic/researcher on topic?

When examining a claim, you must understand the claim and the sources. You must then research the sources, see if the claim is skewing those sources or if those sources are themselves faulty. You must ...
28
votes
3answers
1k views

Should off-the-cuff claims by Donald Trump be considered notable without evidence that people actually believe them?

At the risk of offending EVERYONE of all political spectrums, should we really accept tweets by Trump as "notable" without explicit evidence that people actually believe them and don't just treat them ...
2
votes
2answers
155 views

Does the non-notable close reason apply to claims that already ostensibly provide evidence?

Are the top selling prescription drugs only effective for one in five patients? The claim has a link to an actual peer reviewed article that supports it. It is pointless to ask a question that ...
0
votes
1answer
56 views

Would it be on topic to use skeptics.se when ever I have a question no other SE site would fit for?

I just asked my self: Imagine I come across a question which doesn't fit on any SE site. (What not happens often, but it happened 1 or 2 times so far...) So when I phrase my question into a claim and ...
5
votes
1answer
108 views

Can we make a community decision regarding an “interestingness/consequence/relevance/etc.” test?

I have recently noticed users introducing an "interestingness" or "consequential" test in addition to or in place of our notability requirement. That result doesn't sound very interesting The claim [....
3
votes
3answers
137 views

Can a claim be made based on a URL of an article, even if meaningful information differs between the URL and the article text?

Can a notable claim be made based on a URL of an article, even if meaningful information differs between the URL and the actual claim in the article text? This just came up as a topic in comments, ...
0
votes
1answer
54 views

Is an opinion of supermodel considered “notable” without showing more people believe it?

Do "nightshades" and tomatoes cause inflammation? is a question that is based on a stated opinion of a supermodel. On one hand, it's likely that a lot of people know of that opinion, ...
1
vote
2answers
147 views

Why are strawman claims allowed to stand? [duplicate]

This question: Did Bernie Sanders never "earn a steady paycheck" before 40? Makes for a nice NHQ fodder, due to the topic. Except the "claim" it cites is 100% strawman. The question's "...
6
votes
5answers
190 views

Do we solve puzzles?

A recent question cites a puzzle, and is skeptical that there is an answer. It looks like a notable claim and an expression of skepticism that it is true. Should we accept puzzles as questions? See ...
2
votes
1answer
89 views

Can implied allegations be referenced without direct notability?

There are a number of very common implications I hear often that I may want to ask a question on, but which are just indirect enough to be a little harder to find quotes for. I'm wondering at what ...
12
votes
6answers
203 views

What is a good stack exchange where to learn about skepticism?

Was the "Irish ghost video" staged? If so, how? The last comment of the video analysis explains how original research is not allowed. OR is not "disliked", but explicitly forbidden by ...
10
votes
2answers
855 views

Handling claims that are implied, rather than explicit

If a claim is implied, rather than explicitly stated, is it acceptable to ask about the claim on Skeptics.SE? In the question Is a giant wolffish the result of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident? ...
1
vote
1answer
89 views

What should be done about properly answered non-notable old questions?

Example : Did Nazis use alternatives to Zyklon B? On one hand, it's NOT notable, by any stretch ("according to my dad"). On the other hand, it's already well-answered, a while back. So the main ...
3
votes
1answer
32 views

Is “belief in the claim” part of notability time constrained?

I was reading a Meta question about "Flat Earth" question, and the answers (at least one) seem to be predicated on a time constraint: Several people believe (note present tense) the claim I think ...
3
votes
1answer
83 views

Is there an inconsistency in notability requirements?

I have observed in the past moderators closing the question because it is not notable enough, specifically posted on blog/social media that doesn't show much viewership. However, others seem to be ...
2
votes
3answers
153 views

Are question about “Flat Earth” or other obsolete theories admissible?

Once in a while (and at least twice recently) someone asks questions about, say, “alternate” scientific claims (flat Earth and sight explained by rays from the eyes). This questions are generally ...
10
votes
6answers
480 views

Should we limit [quote] questions?

I'm tired and grumpy, but not sleepy. Probably not a good time to exercise mod powers. So, instead, I will have a bit of a whinge here, to see if anyone else agrees with me, or has suggestions on ...
2
votes
1answer
58 views

Are “is this a legitimate phenomenon?” questions on-topic?

I bumped into an implausible-sounding story from a reputable news source (the BBC, in this case), but for which I can find no supporting evidence (e.g., a Wikipedia article). Would it be on-topic to ...
1
vote
2answers
42 views

Why was this question re-opened?

Does Islam lead to higher crime rates? Why was it re-opened? It seems to have no notable claim evidence at all (and any notable knowledge on the subject is 100% contradictory to the claim, what ...
-2
votes
4answers
113 views

Is the second half of this answer valid content on Skeptics.SE?

This answer to " Have prior U.S. Presidents used executive actions to change immigration policy " contains two halves: Analysis of prior executive actions on immigration policy (full disclosure: I ...
0
votes
1answer
57 views

Is it the law here that “all answers must be referenced”?

Several 'top' users of this site are fond of commenting: "Please provide some references to support your claims." Alongside is usually provided a link to this Skeptics.meta question. Said meta ...
0
votes
1answer
72 views

Why are questions tolerated where the subject and the question in the body are very different?

For example, the question asks "Does X happen" (often, where X happening is not controversial and nobody ever is even skeptical about it happening). The body instead poses the actual notable claim ...
4
votes
1answer
100 views

What is the history of Skeptics.StackExchange?

As a new contributor on this website, I often wonder how this community got to where it is, and how important conventions were established. After getting a lot of feedback from experienced users, I'm ...
11
votes
3answers
410 views

Are magic tricks in scope?

Background It is common to get questions related to magicians and magic tricks, both by self-described illusionists and scammers. These come in diverse forms: Questions about whether "magic is real"...
43
votes
3answers
3k views

FAQ: Must all questions be notable?

One of the key themes of Stack Exchange right from the start has been that you can't have a site about everything. Each SE site has a topic, users who are devoted to that topic, and who will ...
2
votes
3answers
129 views

Should topics covered by other StackExchange sites be considered off-topic?

This is a question spawned from comments to my overly broad opinion piece on the 90 day review. I started responding there before realizing that this really deserves its own discussion thread. The ...
-3
votes
1answer
104 views

Can there be questions on morality?

Some (many?!) philosophers are realists, saying values are real (objective). So there could be a question "Is it wrong to murder people for funsies?" because that is a widespread claim and strong ...
0
votes
1answer
184 views

Making Skeptics less strict or changing the name?

I'm probably going to get bashed here yet again, but I hope for this site to get a little bit more open rather than changing its name. I'll give few examples of what I mean that I quickly gathered ...
9
votes
5answers
205 views

How does the StackExchange model work for Skeptical Analysis?

I feel like there might be a fundamental issue with the format of this website. Overview The StackExchange model works well for subjects where the question is posed for the purpose of helping the ...
7
votes
3answers
176 views

Is the scope of this site unlimited?

I have a difficulty with trying to understand which questions would be off-topic on this site. I understand questions have been closed because they were written in a way that would degenerate into ...
8
votes
1answer
127 views

What sort of skepticism is on-topic?

I ask this question because of the number of questions which could (and should, I think) be considered off-topic, because the crux of the question is not skepticism. This question about statistics is ...
3
votes
4answers
161 views

Are applied mathematics questions on-topic?

This question currently has 2 votes to close. Hopefully I'm not asking this question prematurely, but are we to consider all future applied mathematics questions off-topic or on-topic? I see where ...
10
votes
2answers
210 views

Should we ask questions that don't have answers?

Our FAQ states: You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. Yet there are many questions that fall into our domain whose correct answer is: there is ...
3
votes
4answers
200 views

Should “how to argue” questions be on-topic?

When I read "How to counter 'research shows what research is designed to show' arguments?", I was convinced it would have already several close votes on it. To my surprise, it had none. Not only that, ...
9
votes
2answers
125 views

How to deal with medicine questions and the like

Case example would be this question: Is it dangerous to have several vaccines at the same time? I think that's a perfectly valid question. It has received 5 up votes, and yet one close vote as off ...
7
votes
2answers
286 views

How to deal with questions which an off-site search can answer?

How should we handle questions for which a quick Google or Wikipedia search would provide a great answer? This question was asked on StackOverflow.meta. The response was to answer it anyway, with the ...
4
votes
1answer
98 views

Is Skeptics only for pseudoscience, or for pseudohistory and the like?

Most of the questions here are about pseudoscience, such as homeopathy and anti-vaccination. Are other forms of fringe theories, such as Gavin Menzies' 1421 on-topic?
1
vote
3answers
121 views

In what manner are/n't questions about Logic or Logical Fallacies on-topic?

Culling the definition questions on Area 51, I just noticed there are no questions involving logic or fallacies thereof. Nonetheles, we have one. Should questions involving logic be considered on ...
7
votes
2answers
110 views

How to deal with answers seen as liabilities by some, reasonable by others?

How should the community handle responses that some see as patently wrong to the point of dangerous, but others see from some other position? To use a hypothetical posting situation with respect to ...
3
votes
2answers
92 views

Are questions about the James Randi Educational Foundation on-topic?

As per the site description, this is about applied skepticism: Beta Q&A site for skeptics, rationalists, free thinkers anyone who questions woo and pseudoscience. Skeptics is aimed at applied ...