All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1
vote
1answer
7 views

Can Stack Exchange do a better job of detecting sockpuppets in this site?

I have a strong suspicion that most if not all of the low-quality, bad-faith trolling questions about the Holocaust and Jews are done by the same person using multiple user accounts. A lot of ...
1
vote
0answers
10 views

Should we increase the required question length of the quality filter to deal with Holocaust trolling?

A lot of the trolling questions about the Holocaust (currently, I'm of the opinion it's by one person) have very short question bodies: Did Soviets build a fake chimney in Poland? : One sentence in ...
1
vote
1answer
40 views

Question about a dog collar

I have a question about what evidence there is for claims made by a company for a dog collar that treats certain things affecting your dog. I think on the Pet SE (for pet owners, breeders, caretakers, ...
0
votes
0answers
67 views

Questions with context vs. isolating question from context, and conduct

In this question I took a claim I came about in an environmental essay, which I found intriguing -- "Did the 2018 drought in Europe result in 2019 worldwide grain crop not meeting demand?" ...
15
votes
2answers
325 views

Does featuring a question regarding propaganda on HNQ help do its work?

There's a question featured on HNQ at the moment. The question asks if a headline from a website named Sputnik News is true. As soon as the premise is examined it quickly falls apart and is easily ...
2
votes
1answer
39 views

Why do I have a -2 rep today for “User was removed”

I saw in the reputation dropdown a -2 for this site. On inspection my reputation tab looks as follows. Both of my positive reputation entries come from approved edits - how can these be affected by ...
9
votes
1answer
173 views

How to answer a question when the process of answering the question would reveal personal details of a semi-private figure?

Recently, Was Lt. Col. Vindman a registered Democrat? was asked. I did some research and can come up with a sourced answer, but it involves exposing more information about the Lt. Col. than just his ...
4
votes
2answers
162 views

Limited in what I can do to investigate a suspicious question

For this question, I was extremely suspicious about the question, but I felt like I couldn't justifiably flag it as "Rude and abusive". Is the claim likely to be complete nonsense? Yes, quite ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

What should I do if I uncover new evidence on a question that I answered that invalidates my previous answer?

I recently answered Is “US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128” real? with some information from a forum post. The evidence wasn't great, and I fully admitted it in the answer. However, given the ...
5
votes
1answer
246 views

Why does Google search first display “Are neo-Nazis calling for the murder and torture of Stack Exchange members”?

On multiple, unrelated, computers/networks, on different days, without being logged in to Google, search results for Skeptics Stack Exchange prominently display: Are neo-Nazis calling for the ...
0
votes
1answer
51 views

How to deal with a question where the “notable claim” turned out to be invalid?

Recently, this question was asked and answered. The original version of the question did not have the source of the notable claim provided. When pressed, OP provided a link to a hour-long podcast ...
3
votes
1answer
85 views

Rude/abusive comment left on a now-deleted question; what can be done about it?

Earlier this morning, I came across this question. As well as multiple downvotes, it had attracted a comment consisting of a rather blunt answer followed by "Do your homework". I responded suggesting ...
3
votes
2answers
167 views

Why are questions about Trump often closed?

Why are most questions whose subject is what The President presumably said or did always treated with distrust on this site? Ending up inevitably on hold, closed, deleted etc. Is it an invitation to ...
78
votes
2answers
2k views

I'm resigning as a moderator

As a moderator, I have to help this community thrive and also to represent it towards Stack Exchange. I am convinced that many of SE's recent choices: ads, CoC changes, license changes, are actively ...
1
vote
1answer
47 views

Where should quote-hunting questions go?

Skeptics.SE regularly receives on-topic questions of the form "Did Person X say Quote Y?" The answers fall into a few categories: Yes, they said it at Event Z. No, Person A said it, at Event Z. ...
2
votes
0answers
43 views

sceptics.stackexchange.com should redirect to the site [duplicate]

In British English, “skeptic” is spelled “sceptic”. However http://sceptics.stackexchange.com does not redirect to https://skeptics.stackexchange.com. For the sake of our friends across the pond, can ...
4
votes
2answers
99 views

Let’s fill [lead-poisoning] full of [lead]!

There are currently four questions tagged lead and five questions tagged lead-poisoning, one of which is tagged with both. All of the questions tagged with lead are about lead poisoning, which means ...
2
votes
2answers
292 views

Was there anything wrong with this question about Boris Johnson or its answer?

My question Has Boris Johnson ever referred to any of his opponents as “traitors”? has (perhaps aptly) devolved into a debate about propriety rather than the issues, so I'd like to get a second ...
0
votes
1answer
31 views

Deletion threshold for inconclusive answers

there is some disagreement between me and several people over this answer: https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/44989/50610 Others say that I did not provide enough evidence to meet the standards of ...
2
votes
3answers
90 views

Question about site policy, determined by vote count or chosen answer?

I recently asked a question: Did Hunter Biden launder 3 million dollars of Ukrainian money? That question has a comment that says, Voted to close since "questions about unresolved current events ...
4
votes
1answer
132 views

Skeptics, News, and Politics

As far as I understood it (so far), Skeptics.SE is essentially about science in the broadest meaning of the term, or rather, for answering questions about "pseudoscience and biased results". Ref. Has "...
2
votes
1answer
31 views

Should we favor [social-media] tag over individual social media names, like Twitter or Facebook?

We have social-media, facebook, and twitter tags. Many questions about the named site contain the more generic social-media tag as well. Should we burn named tags or the social-media tag? Is there a ...
2
votes
2answers
166 views

Does trolling count as “rude and abusive”?

If I come across a question that I perceive as trolling, is it ok to flag it as “rude and abusive”? For example, this question (since deleted, but not blanked out) isn’t stating that a particular ...
6
votes
3answers
183 views

Should we follow the international date format standard?

Recently, a question title was edited to change the date from United States format (m-d-Y) to European format (d-m-Y). The reason given was Let's use international standards, tyvm There are ...
0
votes
1answer
87 views

Question worded to force ufologists and skeptics to provide the best UFO evidence = downvotes

I have a question about my Skeptics Stack Exchange post: Is there definitive proof that general UFO phenomenon is fake or real? I would like to invoke readers to provide the closest thing to proof ...
3
votes
2answers
130 views

How notable must doubt be?

Skeptics requires questions to be about notable claims. The burden of proof is on the question to provide evidence that the claim is notable. Must the question also provide evidence that there is a ...
3
votes
1answer
251 views

Should this question have been edited to provide positive spin?

I asked a question here which was edited by User DJ Clayworth to give the question a more positive spin. I edited to a more neutral spin, but he insists on leaving the positive spin version there. As ...
0
votes
1answer
49 views

Should the first letters of tag text be capitalized?

A user recently went through a bunch of the country tags and changed the text, deleting the first few words from those that already had text. As a result, the tag text now starts with an ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

Are self-answers that give general “how to evaluate” guidance welcome here?

The skeptics SE gets a lot of questions related to interpretation of crime statistics in one way or another. Each of the ones that I can see refers to a specific statement, but the same kind of issues ...
0
votes
1answer
73 views

Closure: 'Do Tempur-pedic mattresses differ in material? '

I know little about mattresses. How can Do Tempur-pedic mattresses markedly differ in material? be revised to be on-topic please? Thanks.
3
votes
2answers
90 views

After what time / at what relational distance is an event history and not current events?

I'd like to ask about the limpet mines supposedly used on the oil tankers, but I think this might run afoul of the 'no current events' rule. So my question here: Is there a way to phrase my disbelief ...
8
votes
2answers
154 views

How to answer a question when the only possible path of research leads to a dead end?

Recently, @Gerrit posted the question Did an American kindergarten teach children the alphabet using corporate logos? Everything seems to be in order with regards to the question, with @Gerrit ...
-1
votes
1answer
47 views

Can we add to tagging instructions not to tag on claimant?

Is it possible, in the instructions for tagging, to state that tagging ought to be on the subject of the claim, rather than on the claimant? It’s understandable that the average user won’t browse ...
3
votes
1answer
79 views

On what basis were the answers classified as original research?

Two answers (one of which I wrote) to this question on the commonest boys names in England were recently deleted on the basis they constituted "original research". I would like to understand why this ...
2
votes
0answers
57 views

Comment on deleted question

This question of mine just got deleted for "not notable, disturbing and as political propaganda. No thanks", before I could answer the comment by Oddthinking: A common form of anti-abortion ...
4
votes
0answers
79 views

When did explaining definitive sources become original research? [duplicate]

One of the moderators has decided to delete two answers to the question on the popularity of boys names in the UK (this one Is Muhammad one of the most popular names for boys in England and Wales?) on ...
2
votes
1answer
59 views

Could we undelete the atomic alert answer please

This question has been present on the site for several years, and the top answer has been there four years. I'm aware that it's first hand information, but it does provide useful information. I'm ...
1
vote
1answer
37 views

Asking for sources

Skeptics is a great place to get information on reliable sources and facts. Usually, one posts a claim (one is skeptical about) and the community comes back with really good links or citations for ...
3
votes
2answers
106 views

Help writing good, on-topic questions

I have problems with writing good, on-topic questions and would like to know what went wrong with some of my questions and how to improve them. If something is clearly obvious to you, it might not ...
1
vote
2answers
103 views

Should moderator decisions be more visible to the community?

It's extremely difficult to find out what decisions moderators are making when it comes to deleted answers: either your answer is deleted (which is hopefully rare among upstanding members of this ...
2
votes
1answer
36 views

Does the source of a claim need to be freely accessible?

A millionaire football club owner of a smaller local team in Belgium claimed in an interview that champagne makes grass grow better (he frequently waters his own castle grounds using the drink), and I ...
9
votes
3answers
333 views

Is writing code to parse data original research and therefore inappropriate as an answer?

This answer includes a Python script to parse data. The data source itself is linked. The answer is getting upvoted, presumably because people view it as a helpful contribution. The relevant help ...
5
votes
3answers
189 views

Should we close question about claims taken from reputable peer-reviewed publications?

I'm seeing an increase in questions that cite as their source of claim an article that would itself count as a reputable source for this site. It's from a reputable source, it's peer reviewed, or it ...
5
votes
2answers
95 views

Questions about myth origins vs the myth itself

I recently asked a question about the accuracy of the popular origin story of a myth, but it has been flagged as a duplicate of the question that asks if the myth itself is true. The user who raised ...
7
votes
3answers
285 views

Why was an answer about fracking deleted?

I posted this question, Can fracking help reduce CO2?. It got 3 interesting answers, all of which provided some useful information, from users LShaver, Brythan, and Randy Orrison. Since then, it ...
2
votes
1answer
111 views

Do we need to deal with [brexit]?

Some questions tagged brexit are about claims that are being made by pro or anti Brexit figures, sometimes making a claim about the status quo of Britain's involvement in the EU, but do not appear to ...
0
votes
1answer
80 views

Is this valid syntax?

You've earned the "Enlightened" badge (First to answer and accepted with score of 10 or more) for "Did Aaron Levenstein say 'Statistics are like bikinis'?". "First to answer and accepted"???
3
votes
1answer
45 views

Tag synonym proposal: [archeology] and [archaeology]

Please make archeology and archaeology tag synonyms. Otherwise a single word is represented twice with variant spellings.
1
vote
1answer
30 views

How to increase font size and use bolds?

How to increase font size and use bolds? And other formatting?
3
votes
1answer
101 views

Question Analysis 1: Pollution and its resulting damage

Skeptics.SE is unique from the model "meant" for other SE sites [citation needed]. Thus, if I may say, questions and answers on this site are an acquired taste. What does this mean? That any FAQ on ...

15 30 50 per page