Assuming you're referring to this question:

http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/30632/did-political-analyst-larry-sabato-ever-say-the-higher-the-education-level-th

As you see, the question is not put on hold or closed as off-topic and you've got two answers. Your question has also has a rate of +2, which is not bad. 

Asking about the authenticity of any quote is on-topic as you see [here][1]; there are 122 questions.

However, there are many cases where the community dislikes the question, maybe because sometimes it doesn't really matter whether X said Y or maybe because the OP already found evidence while asking the question.

There could many reasons why your question was not well received and one reason has been explained by [Oddthinking][2]: 

> I don't know why it was downvoted, but I wonder if it is because there is little reason for doubt here. The idea that he said it is a fairly prosaic claim. The Politifact article discusses how they actually asked Sabato to substantiate the quote, and he did so, in a way that they conclude is "Mostly True". Why wouldn't you provisionally accept this rather prosaic claim as true, given the substantial evidence you've already discovered?

  [1]: http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quotes
  [2]: http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/30632/did-political-analyst-larry-sabato-ever-say-the-higher-the-education-level-th#comment115547_30632