"Is dealing clearly with the implications an important part of a good answer?"

I think it is. Another example is, some [tag:quotes] question are of the form "Did so-and-so really say this?" It's on topic to clarify the context in which it was said, i.e. what the person *meant* when they said that.

---

Also I think that the current answer to [Was a class of Dutch school children required to learn Muslim prayer?](http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/37675/2703) could be improved at least slightly.

The title says, explicitly, "required" and "learn Muslim prayer": and I think that makes at least those aspects of "Y" specifically on-topic.
Given that I might be inclined to clarify that:

- It [**wasn't required**](http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/37674/was-a-class-of-dutch-school-children-required-to-learn-muslim-prayer#comment148671_37675)
- They were learning something slightly **other than prayer**: e.g. that this was an opportunity to learn Muslim "culture" and "language" and so on (including "how *Muslims* pray"); an opportunity to meet someone (an Imam) in person; to see inside a mosque, and so on.
- And (at risk of inviting political controversy), given that this visit happened in Holland, they were learning more about (present-day) **Dutch** culture and society.