Then do us the same courtesy
If you don't care about our political opinions (and you shouldn't; this isn't Politics.SE!), then please ensure that we're not being asked to care about (or silently tolerate) yours.
This answer makes a good case in point. A diamond mod has:
Taken it upon themselves to completely rewrite the original (and already accepted) ...
I just wanted to add a counterpoint to the other answer:
I think the moderators have been doing an exceptional job keeping things on track under difficult circumstances. (I do not envy them this job.)
Here's how personally I see it:
We have a range of sources of information, in which we put a differing amount of trust. Here is a rough ordering. (I am sure it could be debated and enhanced, but it is just for illustration.)
Several peer-reviewed, properly-blinded experiments with ...
The general rule for answers is that:
Every answer should be suitable for review and voting by our community of experts in evaluating evidence. Answers which require non-trivial specialist expertise or are anecdotal in nature are not acceptable due to the nature of this community.
One of the premises of skepticism is the application of the scientific ...
The general rule for answers is that:
It is up to the answerer to provide valid, verifiable and potentially replicable evidence, and to show convincingly that it is relevant to the question. Every answer should be suitable for review and voting by our community of experts in evaluating evidence. Answers which require non-trivial specialist expertise or are ...
Your question asks if Twitter has a double standard.
The substance of the deleted answer was some details about a research project nicknamed "Truthy" from Indiana University, that tried to detect misinformation on Twitter. It had nothing to do with Twitter's moderation policies.
The answer in no way addressed the question, and off-topic answers aren't ...
For "absence of evidence" answers, we generally don't accept "Hey, I googled it, and I couldn't find anything relevant." because we can't tell if you searched for the right terms, or maybe the answer is in a book, or in a foreign language, etc.
That makes it very tricky to answer, and this is a quandary frequently faced.
The compromise we have reached, ...
I am going to start with an aside. Writing a good "no-one knows" answer is tricky. We sometimes get people giving non-answers that boil down to "I don't know" or "I couldn't find the answer", which is very different to "no-one knows".
This issue is addressed here: What makes a good "the answer is unknown" answer?
So, if the answer is not a good "...
I was not involved in the act, however I want to publicly support it.
The post was not answering the question, at least not directly. Maybe the OP wanted to show evidence that Truthy had an influence on Twitter and that the influence was statistically significant, and that there are no other similar "influencers" with different political biases compensating....
An old latin name for this combination of name calling and being told you don't know the answer is argumentum ad hominem
From Wikipedia:ad hominem:
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short
for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which
a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant ...
I'm sorry you've had some trouble with your questions. This "question ban" thing is automated and cannot be altered by us moderators. It can only be changed if SE staff decides to change it, which, as far as I know, they never have and likely never will.
Here's the "report" on your questions:
That flag on your Oct 10 question was "...
Well, there are three problems here:
That is not an answerable question. It's based on a claim that claims nothing (yes of course they may - just as dentists may stroke out and drive the pick through your tongue and jaw during a routine cleaning, it is well within the range of possibilities) and instead of using that claim to support a stronger and more ...
There are a number of problems with this answer.
It isn't well-known who proved Fermat's last theorem.
It certainly isn't well known that he or she took walks. That needs a reference.
Even then, that is still an anecdote, and is not evidence.
If it is known that mathematicians and physicists take walks to think at a higher rate than the general population, ...
Let's get our terms straight:
Everyone is biased, but people have different biases.
It's impossible to avoid biases.
which is why we want objective sources.
If an answer lacks sources, especially in its main point, then notify the author in a comment, flag the answer for moderator attention and (if you want) downvote it. Then move on. Moderators review ...
I agree that the answer is of poor quality.
However, I don't think mods should delete poor or wrong answers arbitrarily, as long as they attempt to answer the question and provide some form of evidence. Other steps can be taken to fix that answer (assuming the OP won't fix it):
Try to edit the question and add better links
Vote according to the quality of ...
An anecdote is not a single point of data. An anecdote is an unreliable account which never has the strength of data by definition:
(of an account) Not necessarily true or reliable, because based on personal accounts rather than facts or research.
Characterized by or fond of telling anecdotes.
If you think that an answer is overly emphasized and think it would be better otherwise: edit it. A neutral tone is often better.
For example, I personally find DVK's answer to be diminished by the over use of bold. It makes it much harder to scan and comprehend and makes it look a bit like an "angry" post which I suspect is not what the author inteded.
Anyone with at least 15 rep can "nominate" a post for deletion by flagging it. Mods won't necessarily oblige, but for truly abysmal answers it's a fair bet they'll at least take a hard look. Flags become part of an author's permanent record on the site - too many, and moderators may take action beyond just deleting bad posts.
Anyone with at least 50 rep can ...
I am limiting my discussion to answers posted on the main site. Answers posted on Meta, and questions on the main site having different meanings for downvotes.
I don't have a strong opinion on this matter, but there are a few caveats that should be considered when evaluating the proposal above.
Punitive to OP versus Warning to Others
There is an ...
I really like this idea (I liked it when it was first suggested); as a way to clear up the broken windows as well as a way to promote and encourage new interesting questions it's even better.
If this gets more community support I'm definitely in!
They shouldn't discredit any source at all.
One should not be able to ask a question excluding evidence, because that's a cherry picking fallacy. Similarly, we might ask the OP to present a verbatim version of a claim to avoid straw man fallacies.
For example, one should not be allowed to ask "I don't trust Project Blue Book (a long term study of UFO ...
I'll answer it looking at existing reasons to delete the answer.
My personal opinion is that answers such as these do not add anything worthwhile to the site, hurt the sites reputation, and should be deleted.
I think regarding flagging, there are two options that can be considered:
very low quality This answer has severe formatting or ...
Welcome to the Skeptics.SE, Syzygy. I am sorry your first experience was so confusing.
I recommend having a read of our Welcome to New Users. It explains some of the ways in which we are different to other forums.
One of the biggest ways we are different is in how we deal with opinions. Other sites (e.g. YouTube, Reddit, Twitter and the comments section on ...
I don't believe this is strongly answerable. If we assume that the "verified oldest people" are the actual oldest people (or at least close) then that raises the question of why there isn't anyone using yoga to live for hundreds of years, but it's a vague/weak enough claim that it's difficult to disprove completely. How does one differentiate between "It can'...