Does the new version contain any substantial new claims that aren't addressed by the existing question?
If no, it's a duplicate.
If yes, (for example, new columns claiming X, Y and Z media outlets are "controlled" in such a way), single them out and make the question about them. It's not a "fact check this image" or "address this broad conspiracy theory", ...
I'm not strongly opposed to reopening (and if you get 4 more re-open votes, it will be done without me), but I am not excited by this question.
It asks about "similarities", which is ultimately opinion-based, and doesn't belong here.
You seem to be in possession of all of the facts. The examples you gave cite references. The existing answers cite references....
You can contest it in 2 ways
By flagging the question, with a custom reason explaining why you dont think it is a duplicate
By posting on meta, as you have here.
The former will only alert diamond mods, they may agree or disagree and reopen accordingly (or not). The latter will alert everyone who is active on meta, which may well get you the 5 reopen votes ...
My vote goes to mark as duplicate, it's the same claim but they are two different examples of it.
Some people clearly believe that Jews control the media -- this is the claim we should be addressing, not every single possible variation of it.
On the other hand, I am convinced that a new answer would require another heroic effort and would result in the same ...
This is a slightly tricky one.
I think we all agree on the following:
There is a claim that microcephaly incidents are currently higher in Brazil.
There is a popular claim that the Zika virus is the cause.
There is an alternative claim that pyriproxyfen is the cause.
The real answer might be that Zika is the cause; that pyriproxyfen is the cause; that ...
The question has two different problems.
The first is that it is too broad - if someone has a strong evidence-based answer to one of the claims, they can't post it, because it doesn't answer all of the questions. The current list of questions should be closed as Too Broad, as it is unfair to expect an answerer to address all of the claims. It should be ...
You simply clicked the wrong edit link! Easy mistake to make, it's not all that obvious unless you know it's there
Once clicked, you can use the "Add" button to add as many other duplicates as you like
However, it appear you need to be a gold tag holder to access this feature: Gold tag-badge holders and moderators can now edit duplicate links
I think that the question should be closed.
The claim it asks to examine is the same quote by Netanyahu. It reduces the original question to be less about motivation, but I feel that essentially this is the same question, and that the author should have edited the original question first, and only if the edit was rejected by the community, to open a new ...