Timeline for How can a question be migrated?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 13, 2011 at 18:49 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | If a question is going to be closed no matter what, it's ok to move it to a beta site, assuming the question is suitable for the proposed target site (which it obviously isn't in this case). | |
| May 12, 2011 at 11:57 | history | edited | SklivvzMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 122 characters in body
|
| May 12, 2011 at 11:42 | comment | added | Martin Scharrer | The migration dialog says "Please avoid migrating questions to beta sites unless the circumstances are exceptional.". The funny thing is that the list of possible target sites does not mark the beta sites any special. Ok, the icons of the beta sites seem to have all the same style. (I'm a moderator myself on a different SX site) | |
| May 12, 2011 at 11:05 | comment | added | Sklivvz Mod | @Fabian, exactly! That's why I used the term guideline and not rule :-) | |
| May 12, 2011 at 11:00 | comment | added | Mad Scientist Mod | That rule is more meant for migrations from launched sites to beta sites, and mostly for overlapping topics. Migrations between beta sites and for blatantly off-topic posts are acceptable, as far as I understand the guidelines. | |
| May 12, 2011 at 10:13 | vote | accept | apoorv020 | ||
| May 12, 2011 at 10:13 | |||||
| May 12, 2011 at 9:51 | comment | added | apoorv020 | Hmmm... pity. I will just add a comment asking the user to repost the question. | |
| May 12, 2011 at 9:31 | history | answered | SklivvzMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |